I evaluated all of our tool using two sets of fantasy accounts you to was hands-coded of the dream professionals making use of the Hall–Van de- Castle program (§cuatro.dos.1): (i) this new annotated selection of fantasy profile, and (ii) brand new normative place where brand new norms included in this new books were determined. For all those dream accounts, we measured the new the amount that the brand new groups of characters, correspondence and ideas estimated by the dream handling product matched up this new corresponding soil-information establishes; desk 4 summarizes new resulting precision, recall and you can F1-rating.
We next proceeded to compare the the newest Hallway–Van de Palace indications computed because of the our very own product (dining table step one) on corresponding ground-realities thinking. Considering the floor-truth value v in addition to tool’s worth v ? , we determined the fresh new mistake due to the fact elizabeth = | v ? v ? | .
Overall, the typical error across categories was 0.twenty four (profile 3b), which is limited as a result of the high variability regarding textual styles during the the latest corpus, therefore the inherent complexity of some of your own strategies. So you can interpret the newest magnitude of your own error, you ought to imagine one to, in practice, every signs undertake viewpoints which can be typically inside the fresh new [0,1] assortment about particular shot set of dream account. The fresh new level one deviates really from this diversity ‘s the An effective / C List : it is greater than 1 in 6% of one’s cases regarding the ground-specifics and also in 3% of times based on our very own unit. The fresh An effective / C List , is even influenced by the best mistake (e = 0.45). It is partially since the diversity are a little more than those individuals regarding most other indicators, and because it entails the new identification from characters and also the recognition regarding acts out of violence, being possibly uncertain inside their interpretation and, as a result, are difficult getting immediately removed. As we have already stated, so you’re able to partly mitigate the fresh effect of the tool’s errors to your formula away from h-pages, i stabilized our metrics making use of the empirically outlined norms. Within our corpus, in lieu of aggression acts hence have a tendency to take some models, intimate relations take predictable models, generally involve a few individuals having sexual intercourse, and you will, as such, are simpler to automatically pick; friendly connections, in addition, is identified having an amount of complications that’s anywhere between hostility acts’ and you can amicable interactions’.
In addition to reporting absolute errors, we separately report errors of overestimation ( e over = v ? v ? if v ? v ? > 0 ) and of underestimation ( e under = | v ? v ? | if v ? v ? < 0 ), which are computed without considering zero-error instances (figure 3c). Overall, each pair of bars are aligned; the more aligned each pair of bars, the better. That is because alignment indicates that overestimation is comparable to underestimation and, in a large set, their effects partly cancel themselves out and, as such, end up having little impact on our results.
5. Research the 5 lookup hypotheses
Shortly after which have ascertained the new legitimacy of one’s tool’s efficiency and you can using they into groups of dream reports explained from inside the §4.dos.step 1, i set out to take to the five hypotheses.
Men and https://datingranking.net/tr/chatfriends-inceleme/ women dream accounts differ into the a number of trick elements. As opposed to females reports, men of them consisted of way more hostility markers and you will, this means that, a whole lot more bad feelings (contour 4).The brand new A / C List is very high (h > 0.2). Although this index would-be overestimated of the the tool, the latest modification applied by empirical norms ensures that men dream profile have thousands of serves regarding hostility. In comparison, girls profile contains more self-confident thinking and a lot more friendly relations, which is in line with the very first hypothesis.
Leave a Reply